An Image Search Brings In 17,500 Visitors And HubPages NoFollow Tag Rules
Hi all,
We’ve have a couple of interesting finds in the past few days that I would like to share with you.
Firstly, I happened to see an email come in from hubpages (I use this site a lot in web 2.0 promotion, and suggest you should as well).
If you’ve used it, and signed up for their newsletter, or whatever it is, you get an email from them every now and again.
I usually delete the emails without looking, but this one caught me eye.
Your Hubs have been viewed 24,356 times.
WOW !
A website that we threw up in January of this year, and have never been back to since had received over 24,000 visitors!
In fact it turned out to be an ordeal to login again, because I have forgotten the details, and it wanted an email address to send the forgotten password to.
And in this game, you burn a heck of a lot of emails. The reason it turned out so hard for me, is that I use a “catch all” domain, so when I register at a web 2.0 site, I can put “anything I want”@nameofdomain.com and the email gets back to me.
Makes it a lot quicker to register, as there is no need to setup a new email account each time (of course it goes without saying that you don’t do it this way all the time, otherwise that’s a footprint).
Anyway, because I used the catch all address, I had to figure out the part I had registered with before the @nameofdomain.com bit. Hubpages wanted the full email address to send me the password.
Sorry..I digress.
Long story short: I eventually found the email, and managed to log into the website.
Here’s the kicker….
Since January 2008, over 24,000 visitors have reached this little hub. It’s a very very simple hub, with about 3 images, 1 video, and a 600 word article. With a couple of links to a money page.
That’s it! Oh and a place for people to leave comments.
No other monetization on the page.
Ready for the shocking confession? It turns out the links to the money pages were not really valid (they pointed to another website I no longer use).
End result: I’ve wasted 24,000 visitors who might have bought something ![]()
They had no where to go or nothing to buy from me. Ouch!
I’ve since corrected the problem, and added some adsense to it as well as a trial.
Early this morning, I woke up with a start, suddenly remembering the reason I had set this website up in the first place.
I’d set it up for Images, and specifically getting traffic from people searching for images.
A method that no one seems to use, let alone talk about.
Guess what. The strategy worked, and in fact had been working for many months.
I’d just somehow not added this hub to my excel spreadsheet containing all my websites, when it was originally setup, and because of a silly typo, was not receiving any of the 24,000 visitors hungry clicks!
Here are the incredible statistics.
65% of the traffic was from images.google.com and around 8% from other countries including images.google.ca, images.google.de, and images.google.ie, and images.google.hu !
So around 73% of 24,000 visitors (approx 17,500) made it to the page searching for images! How is that for a traffic strategy?
Of course, some of these people may have just displayed the image in the image search and not actually clicked through to the hub (this would still register as a visit) but early testing seems to indicate a decent percentage are clicking through.
Now you would think these people would not be interested in anything but images, right?
Wrong! In 24 hours, the website has made $15 in adsense.
Now $15 is nothing to write home about, but it tells me that people are finding the image and clicking through to the page, and then happily doing something on the website i.e. clicking my links.
I haven’t had the chance to check google analytics to see how many clicks to my money page have been made, but this is exciting stuff.
If I wanted to be negative about it, I would calculate that we have missed out on approximately 30 x $15 = $450 a month in adsense, or around $4K since January (ouch I guess I did just think about it, it hurts to think of it in those terms). Better not let Anthony know about that stat. Luckily he is off at band practice tonight and hopefully won’t read this post
The real interesting thing to me (and hopefully to you now) is that you can get a healthy number of visitors finding your site when searching for images.
Are you using this strategy? If not, it’s time to look into it, isn’t it?
Of course I’ll be adding this neat little trick to the quick start guide now (and also the hidden little tip on how to get the right text indexed with your image).
You want the traffic to be targeted don’t you?
And this is using hubpages, just wait till I talk to you about the flickr method for images. Pure gold.
It does not get much simpler than this though. Upload a picture, get traffic!
On the subject of hubpages, I’d also like to share this with you.
Specifically, it’s about hubpages and the nofollow tag.
Seems as though something has changed there, and now only certain hubs get dofollow tags, the rest get nofollow tags!
My testing (and asking other people about there experiences) seems to indicate that any hubs with a hub score less than 70 will get nofollow tags. If your hub score is 70 and above, you are good to go and will get dofollow tags, and enjoy the link power.
This is another reason to focus on putting up a decent quality hub and checking back from time to time to update it. May as well give them what they want.
So long as your hub score is 70 or above you are good to go. I tested this today, finding a hub on 69 and it had nofollow tags, and found a few other ones in the 70’s and 80’s and they were all dofollow, so seems to confirm it.
If you have a hub on hubpages, rush off and check it for yourself! If your hub score is less than 70, you have some work to do!
Hope this short little article has been useful to you.
Until next time,
Cheers
Tim






Reader Comments
Tim,
Really good post…not found anywhere else!
I have a hosted WP blog that gets 100% of its traffic (about 50 hits per day) because of one image I posted in an article. (the niche is very competitive but not on the image side of the search)
The issue I have is that those people are not clicking or buying. I just can’t figure out how to monetize it. I wish there was some way to redirect these folks to a CJ affiliate or something similar.
However, I have found one good thing in regards to getting traffic for the images and that comes in flipping the site. When people buy websites, they care about traffic and NEVER ask if it came from images. They just wanna know if the traffic is coming from Google in general.
That is my ticket to gold! I just want to make sure that I am dealing and selling the site honestly, so I am still coming up with a sales strategy.
(I am following you on Twitter and appreciate your insights)
AL
Definitely would like to hear more about this. I have a pretty image intensive site and wind up ranking high for good keywords, but when I check it’s often a Google Images rank. I’d love to find a way to better use this. Feel like I’m missing something obvious, but is there a tool I can use that would draw each of my images into a template with my header, or otherwise give the visitor an easy way to get to my main site and earn me some clicks?
Thanks for writing, Cliff
quick question… I read your post in the warrior forum to the girl who was trying not to lose her rental house….
You gave a blueprint for a strategy that has part 1, part 2, & part 3…
I get part 1.
On part 2, you said to duplicate part one but only link to the pages you created in part 1 instead of your money site. This makes sense too.
My question is, the sites i create for part 2 (say a wikidot & a wetpaint & 2 others) do I just send out 1 link each to the pages in part 1 or do I link to all 4 pages or does it even matter?
In other words, say I created a squidoo, hubpage, weebly & wordpress in part one.
In part 2, I create a wetpaint, wikidot, hubpage, & wordpress… Do I link the wetpaint to just the squidoo and the wikidot to just the weebly, etc… or do I link the wetpaint to all 4 above?
Also, you say to link to the digg and propeller posts… Do I create seperate pages for these links or do I just add them to a site already linking to one of the others.
It would seem to me that if all 4 pages in step 2 linked to all 4 pages in step one that it would creat an obvious footprint, but I may be wrong.
Thanks,
Kevin
Good post. I hadn’t really thought much about the naming and tagging of my images as a way to drive traffic. Somewhere along the line (I think from Stompernet) I had heard that too much image tagging is considered keyword stuffing and frowned upon by Google. But I can now see with the right image this could be a very effective traffic generation method.
I’d also like to see your answer to Kevin’s question. I haven’t really followed your entire linking system posts and would like to see you expound on the answer to his question in a future post.
Thanks,
Jane
Great reminder that I need to visit my inactive, unpublished Hubpage and get it published! There is much that I can add to Hubpages on the subject of internet marketing for attorneys. I also appreciate the information about the importance of achieving a Hubpage score of 70 or more. Thanks for your great content.
Bentley Tolk
Wish my hub page existed,,it will,the force is with me.
This story gave me a laugh and an insight. Something similar re: images happened to me. I’ve owned the domain name (fromoutoftheblue.com) for 10 years. I hadn’t done anything significant with it until a couple of months ago when I started it’s current incarnation. Prior to that, for the last couple of years, I had a page about web services and several pages of galleries. I didn’t think anyone was looking at them – no one ever said “hi” or “thanks for the pics” or anything like that and I wasn’t promoting the site or using analytics. But, after starting the site it is now, I noticed that many of the 404 pages were searches for the images that were previously on the site.
One page had 10 photos of a derailed train that were apparently used by a train company of some kind.
I put a note on a custom 404 page letting people know they could contact me about the images that were there, but no one has done so.
Thanks for the tips.
Peter
Great post. Yes, always a good idea to make sure that your images are included in your site map to allow those image spiders easy access. I am releasing a plug in that aids this process next week. Anyone interested, I’ll send you a beta. Please let me know. Thanks, Allen
My hubpage shows up in the listings first (#1!) when you do a search for theme weddings at hubpages, but I guess I’ll have to do a little more promoting since its at 69, and it’d be nice to get the dofollow tag!
I did notice that the more people who give it a “thumbs up” (at the bottom) the more the score goes up! (the page started at 65). It went up 4 points in the first few days after I sent a bunch of people there. Of course, the votes aren’t the only thing to get higher scores, but they help!
I’ve heard of this strategy actually, it’s pretty well known two ways – hubpages is well known, and the image monetization /traffic is also quite overdone.
It’s not as simple as it sounds, and the traffic is kinda sketchy because most people click through to the direct image, which just wastes bandwidth. If you try to prevent this by having a piece of javascript on your pages that break the frame – Google will detect it and stop showing your pages. So it’s best to not allow the image to be shown/hotlinked (can do this via cpanel or in google webmaster).
what images did you upload? I’m going to get myself a hubpage account now, thanks for the reminder.
Can you put up a section somewhere on the blog for latest posts, so I don’t have to go to my email each time to see what your latest posts are? Thanks.
Albert,
The images were just part of a hubpages website.
The latest posts always appear on the front page of our blog, just below the opt-in box.
Will try and make this a little clearer.
Cheers
Tim
Tim you have a whole method here ready for bottling into a special report – it’s a little hard to follow in it’s present slightly breathless form…
amazing numbers man
Alex
Hey the guy above talks about you on the warrior forum… can you tell us about this post , cause you have nothing about wikidot and weebly and wetpaint in your free classes.. just wondering if that is a good idea to make pages there also…
Hi Candy,
Our premium member program goes into this in more details (along with a lot more information). We could not squeeze a lot of this information into the free course.
Regards
Tim
Great tip, Tim. I don’t use HubPages nearly as much as I should — just not enough hours in a day. But I think you made an error in your e-mail — don’t you mean you’d buy an Orange with that extra $4000 in Adsense?
Haven’t thought about the power of images before…
Thank you for bringing this into my mind!
It’s really useful info!
Greetings,
Claus D Jensen
Great info – I’m heading off to my hubpage right away. It really didn’t occur to me to use images as a traffic generating tool but then, that’s why you are the master and I’m the student……..
Hi Tim Thankyou for all the great info you keep providing. I’m also wondering more about the strategy you mentioned in the warrior forum. Do you have a link to that post??? I am doing your new web traffic and marketing blueprint and feel you don’t explain this concept of linking without footprints well enough…it leaves a lot of questions to be answered especially as ed dale does it differently in the 30dc and you guys were learners from there weren’t you??? Things like if i added every web 2.0 to traffic bug is that leaving a footprint…or if i then add them all to the networker in IE is that leaving a footprint??? also in your mind movies videos you don’t show exact examples of what seo you actually did??? Sorry bout the big post i just dont know how to get in touch with you guys to ask these types of things. Also cant get web genius to work in my wordpress direct page??? any ideas??
thanks
I haven’t got a hubpages account/page but, I’ll definitely be looking into it now. A lot of my traffic also comes from image searches, as I make sure the name of the image is relevant to the picture, because I search for images a lot as well and love it when an image is named/tagged appropriately and easy to find, so I try to follow the same procedure. But I don’t think many of these take a look around the rest of the site after getting the picture, so I don’t know how I could improve that yet. I may look into find out out how other websites, when you click the image in google, instead of showing a thumbnail of the pic and the article in the frame underneath, it redirects to the page. Or is it best to avoid methods like that, I haven’t really looked into it to be honest, not yet anyway.